Rosio Pavoris

Wooh~

Rednwhite’s microphone broke, so he doesn’t get to be one of the cool kids, but some other people sent in their contributions to the Raven project.
Ros (from the Pharyngula chat) and his pet lesbian Leah sent in verses 7 and 12, respectively.
Unfortunately, apparently the only decent audio conversion software I had decided to stop working after I converted Leah’s, so Ros’s was converted using some other software, so he sounds like a chipmunk. This bug is documented, which is why I encoded it as 44.100 kHz. This did not fix it.

This doesn’t bother me particularly because it sounds cool anyway, but if anyone has better audio editing software they want to recommend, feel free.

Edit: ‘kay, Coren fixed it. Still, I feel the original should be preserved.

Permalink 5 Comments

Jesus died in Japan at age 106

Brilliant!

And because it does away with the resurrection story (see, it was his brother, Jsus Chri, who died at the cross), it’s actually more credible than the original.

Permalink Comments

The Raven Project Revisited~

Got more responses to our Raven Project than expected. Well done, peoples.
I’ve put them all up here. Page, not a post, so I can add to it if anyone else want to send in a verse (I’m looking at you, rednwhite. O\__/O). Just pick one that hasn’t been done yet and do it. I’m assuming everyone has my e-mail.

As promised, kitties!

Permalink 5 Comments

Memes~


What American accent do you have?
Your Result: The Inland North

You may think you speak “Standard English straight out of the dictionary” but when you step away from the Great Lakes you get asked annoying questions like “Are you from Wisconsin?” or “Are you from Chicago?” Chances are you call carbonated drinks “pop.”

Philadelphia
The Northeast
The Midland
The South
Boston
The West
North Central
What American accent do you have?
Take More Quizzes

(It’s interesting how this doesn’t display correctly in either IE or Firefox~)


You Are a Chocolate Martini
You’re an elegant drunk, who only likes the best bars and the most expensive drinks.
A bit of a cheapskate, you’re likely to mooch ten dollar drinks off both friends and strangers.

You should never: Drink and dash. You’re gonna get caught leaving someone with the tab!

Your ideal party: A posh celebrity party you crash, with an open bar.

Your drinking soulmates: those with a Classic Martini personality

Your drinking rivals: those with a Blueberry Martini personality

What Flavor Martini Are You?

You Are Surrealism
Dreamy and idealistic, you’ve created a world that is all your own.
It’s very likely that you’ve either dabbled in drugs or are naturally trippy.
You are always trying to push beyond the boundaries of your culture and society.
You believe that art, love, and freedom can change the world.
What Art Movement Are You?

You Are 0% Republican
If you have anything in common with the Republican party, it’s by sheer chance.
You’re a staunch liberal, and nothing is going to change that!
How Republican Are You?

You Are 80% Democrat
You have a good deal of donkey running through your blood, and you’re proud to be liberal.
You don’t fit every Democrat stereotype, but you definitely belong in the Democrat party.
How Democrat Are You?

Possibly I need a hobby.

Permalink 1 Comment

Kasper en Hobbes~

Permalink 1 Comment

Therefore, God exists.

This is actually pretty old, but I just came across it again. The TGE Project.

415. ETERNAL’S ARGUMENT FROM GENITALIA

1) I have a penis.
2) I can pee and ejaculate with it.
3) Therefore, God exists.

I find this strangely compelling. D:
Incidentally:

4. ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT (II)

(1) God exists.
(2) Since God exists, God must be perfect.
(3) That which is perfect must exist.
(4) Therefore, God exists.

This is actually an argument theologians (including René fucking Descartes) have put forth with a straight face.
These people parody themselves.

Also, I found out earlier that God in Albanian is Zot. This is vaguely amusing.

Permalink Comments

The God Delusion

The God DelusionI finished The God Delusion by Richard Dawkins last night. As expected, it’s a pretty important book. I didn’t actually learn anything new, but I’ve been saying most of what’s in the book for a while now, and I’m not actually the target demographic.

The target demographic is the fence-sitters, the religious moderates, and such atheists as are not antitheist, and I’m sure the book will open the eyes of at least a few of them.
Dawkins’s arguments are carefully thought out, as usual, and he pulls fewer punches than he did in his documentary The Root of All Evil? (the name of which was a move by the producers he didn’t agree with), which I’m sure I linked to a while ago but which Google Video pulled almost as long ago.

He goes into some detail regarding various specific problems with religion, and elaborates on general problems with irrationalism, but is also careful to point out the value of the Bible (and various other “holy” texts) as a culturally influential document which is worth studying in school, just like the Roman and Greek mythologies.

I won’t go into the details. He mentions Skatje’s dad and his blog (more specifically this post) in a footnote, which is cool. He didn’t mention me at all, but I’m sure he’ll rectify that in the second edition.

Anyway, buy this book and read it and pass it on to people you know. The fate of the world may depend on it, even if it isn’t as persuasive as it could’ve been because Dawkins is a fundamentally nice person.

(On a mostly unrelated note, thinking about The Root of All Evil? obviously got me thinking about Ted Haggard again, which in turn brought to mind this song. MP3 plays in the background automatically, so NSFW if your work computar has speakers~)

Permalink Comments

The Selfish Gene

The Selfish GeneSo, I just finished The Selfish Gene by Richard Dawkins (at last, eh?), and I must say it lives up to its reputation.
I read the 30th-anniversary edition, which has the added chapter from the second edition and some annotation.

In it, Dawkins argues that the basic unit of evolution is the gene, and that pretty much everything can be explained from the point of view of the reproduction of genes, in a “a chicken is the egg’s way of making another egg”, only with replicators (genes, in this case) and vehicles (organisms). At this point this isn’t a revolutionary concept anymore to anyone, which tells you something about how influential this book has been.
He also elaborates on how genes aren’t necessarily the only replicators, and talks about memetics in that light for a bit. It’s easy to forget Dawkins is the one who formally came up with the concept of memes, though he just intended it as a side note.

In the last chapter, which was added in the second edition in the ’80s, he convincingly argues for extending the concept of phenotype to include effects outside of the organism’s body itself. Like, if a snail’s shell is considered to be phenotypic, why shouldn’t a caddisfly’s larva’s cases, or a beaver’s dam?
At times this chapter feels like just a plug for The Extended Phenotype, but it’s obviously very relevant and interesting.

Obviously I don’t do it justice. Dawkins is nowadays mostly known for his atheism, I guess, but his contributions to evolutionary biology and popular science aren’t to be underestimated. It’s a very interesting book pretty much anyone should read. There are some jabs at religion in the notes, but they aren’t the subject of the book.
I’m reading The God Delusion (which Skatje gave me for my birthday) now~

Permalink 2 Comments

Education’d!

Part 1 explains what’s going on in greater detail.
Along the same lines, this is worth watching (and is a few months old, at this point, so you may have seen it before). No explanation of what’s going on, but if you have any background in biology at all, you should be able to figure out at least a few things.

Permalink Comments

On Hate Crimes

Skatje’s dad posted this, which obviously led to someone commenting that labelling any group as a “hate” group is counterproductive, mentioning thoughtcrime. This led me to think about hate crimes, because people tend to say the same thing about them. I don’t think that’s right, though. I’ve touched on this before, but this time in greater detail~

First, some marginally related background. Essentially, I believe crimes can be classified by motivation as such:

  • Crimes of necessity. Stealing because you have no source of income is the most obvious one in this category, but arguably you could also place crime for the sake of asserting dominance in a gang and crimes out of habit in this. Some assassinations can be put in this category, as well as crimes motivated by addiction or insanity.
  • Crimes of passion. Killing a rival over a lover, and whatnot. Most sex crimes fall under this, obviously, and arguably so do many crimes motivated by insanity.
  • Hate crimes. You could call this a subset of passion crimes, but it’s important that you keep them separate for reasons I’ll get to in a bit.
  • Non-crimes. Things like drug use and “sodomy” and suicide and homosexuality and whatnot. Victimless crimes, all (or crimes where the only real victim is the perpetrator). These things are often argued as public order crimes, but honestly, no, not really. Motivations for these laws are often religious, but not always.

There are probably some crimes that don’t fall into any of these categories, but they aren’t very relevant to the case at hand, I think.

So why do I feel hate crimes should be separate from (other) passion crimes both in my little classification scheme and in terms of sanctions? Several reasons.

First is that because of the higher incidence of repeat crimes in the case of hate crimes than passion crimes. A person who, say, assaults a person because he’s black is much more likely to assault another person for the same reason than a person who assaults someone because he has a problem specifically with that person.

Another (possibly more important) reason is that hate crimes are intended not just to damage the direct victim (say, the homosexual who was murdered) but also to spread fear among the group that person belongs to (or is perceived as belonging to, in this example every homosexual anywhere).
In this sense, there is something to be said for renaming hate crimes domestic terrorism.

So yes. Motivation and intent do matter. If you think they shouldn’t, and only the crime itself should, consider these things:

Two men vandalise two synagogues. One spray-paints “KILROY WAS HERE” on the wall. The other spray-paints a swastika. Both are strictly speaking just vandalism. Would you consider both crimes to be equivalent in seriousness?

If you do, consider the term “malice aforethought”. Or, at an even plainer level, the difference between murder and manslaughter.

The idea that hate crime laws will lead to thoughtcrime laws is retarded hyperbole.
Keep in mind that these laws only apply as aggravating circumstances to “actual” crimes. Nobody’s thinking of banning hate groups, because that is one place where the slippery slope argument is not a fallacy. Freedom of speech is important to any civilised society, and there’s nothing wrong with healthy paranoia, but hate crime laws aren’t a freedom of speech issue.

One other argument I hear a lot is that hate crime laws are based entirely on morals, which are subjective and can and do change. This is silly.
All Almost all laws are based on morals. I’m not a strict moral relativist. Things like murder and theft and whatnot are generally to be regarded as bad things, and will be illegal in pretty much all societies (not counting murder of outsiders, which occasionally is legal, but that’s a different matter entirely), but there’s a reason the legislative branch is a permanent and very busy branch of government.
The moral Zeitgeist does change, and changes quite a lot. This is why homosexuality, for instance, is no longer illegal in most of the West. The point I’m trying to make is that almost all laws will eventually get challenged and probably overturned at one point in their lifetime. This is why our laws are not set in stone, but subject to the democratic process, and the subjective morality argument isn’t relevant.

I just wanted to get this out of the way. I know this isn’t the most convincing post ever, mostly because of my tendency towards passive research and incoherence, but perfect posts can’t really be discussed, so that would be boring.
As such, discuss.

(As a side note, in general, I’ve found that people who oppose hate crime legislation are people who are very unlikely to be subject to hate crimes themselves. Not always true, but still interesting.)

Permalink 1 Comment

Happy Birfdey, Maia

Maia turns 18 today. Wish her a happy birfdey. >.>
I guess I could find that birthday cake picture and draw her name on it, but I think a catten would be more appreciated.

Permalink Comments

Elephant fetus is adorable

Film at 11.
I’d totally be willing to support a total abortion ban on those~

Actually I wouldn’t, also because birth control is much harder for elephants. Do you know how big and thick an elephant condom has to be?

(Also check out the other pictures in those galleries, even if they are mostly CG. Dolphins are cute too. Via Pharyngula.)

Permalink Comments

Thanksgiving isn’t a real holiday

Where was the celebration for the Feast of the Dynasty last week, eh?

Permalink 1 Comment

Meme~

Stolen from Skadhi.

  1. What time did you get up this morning? 18:00, just in time for dinner~
  2. Diamonds or Pearls? Probably pearls, for the understatement. Diamonds are too sparkly.
  3. What was the last film you saw at the cinema? Borat. ;.;
  4. What are your favourite TV shows? I have favorite TV shows?
  5. What did you have for breakfast? Dinner was turkey (overcooked) with rice and curry sauce and sliced apricots.
  6. What is your middle name? I have none. My second and third first names are Simon and André, though.
  7. What is your favourite cuisine? Probably Italian. Belgian has a few really good things going for it but is mostly meh.
  8. What foods do you dislike? Most things that breathe water. And most parts of pigs.
  9. Your favourite Potato chip? The kind that is chipped potato. Interesting use of capitalisation there.
  10. What is your favourite CD at the moment? I don’t really buy CDs. I guess The Spine is pretty good.
  11. What kind of car do you drive? The one that goes on rails and has a lot of other people in it.
  12. Favourite sandwich? Martino. That would be hard to explain to people not in Flanders.
  13. What characteristics do you despise? Wilful ignorance.
  14. What are your favourite clothes? None. \o/
  15. If you could go anywhere in the world on vacation, where would you go? Belgium. But I want to invite people.
  16. What colour is your bathroom? Er. Brownish? Possibly beige?
  17. Favourite brand of clothing? My mom, who does my clothes shopping, has decided this is Hugo Boss.
  18. Where would you want to retire to? To the moon!
  19. Where you born? Right here. Well, actually over there.
  20. Favourite sport to watch? What’s the one with the guys and the ball and the going back and forth? Yeah, not that one.
  21. Who do you least expect to do this / send it back? You.
  22. Person you expect to send it back/steal it first? Possibly Terru. Because he’s trying to keep up with two posts a day.
  23. Coke or Pepsi? If I have to, Coke.
  24. Are you a morning person or night owl? Night owl, only I don’t hunt mice very often.
  25. Any new and exciting news you’d like to share with everyone? I’m pregnant.
  26. What did you want to be when you were little? Park ranger~
  27. What is your best childhood memory? I have good childhood memories? D:
  28. What are the different jobs you have had or do in your life? >_________>
  29. Nicknames? As in pet names rather than internets nicks? None.
  30. How many Piercings? None anymore.
  31. Eye Colour? Brownish.
  32. Ever been to Africa? Morocco. Not a nice place to visit.
  33. Ever been toilet papering? Nei.
  34. Been in a car accident? A few times. Never while driving.
  35. Favourite day of the week? Probably Friday, even though I have to get up at 6. Saturday is too short because I sleep until dinner, and Sunday fails because I have to be up at 6 on Monday.
  36. Favourite restaurant? I like that place in Walloonyland. La Cure? Not sure.
  37. Favourite flower? Pansy, possibly.
  38. Favourite fast food restaurant? Probably McDonald’s, actually, though I prefer Quick.
  39. How many times did you fail your driver’s test? Er. Twice, I think.
  40. From whom did you get your last e-mail? Not counting the KHL mailing list spam, Skadhi. :3
  41. Which store would you choose to max out your credit card? Any decent book store. Those are hard to find, though.
  42. Who are you most curious about their responses to this questionnaire? Nobody’s. I don’t really care.
  43. Last person you went to dinner with? I… have no idea. Probably Coren and Barbara, if you count getting sammich.
  44. What are you listening to right now? Ievan Polkka~
  45. What is your favourite colour? Black.
  46. How many tattoos do you have? None.
  47. How many people are you sending this to? None.

People need to think of more interesting questions.

Permalink Comments

Oh, hey…

Someone at the KHL sent out an e-mail pointing out where our schedule for the year can be found. I think that makes it the second vaguely useful e-mail to come out of those mailing lists yet. Out of about four hundred.

Apparently we don’t get any individual days off at all this semester. We’re currently in week 9 of classes, out of 13. The week of fall break doesn’t count as a week.
Christmas vacation starts the week of Christmas itself (which is a Monday), and lasts two weeks. Then three weeks of exams, then two more weeks of break.

Second semester starts on February 12th. It appears we don’t get Krokus vacation (”spring break”), so seven straight weeks of class until the Easter break, which lasts two weeks. Then an other six weeks, immediately followed by four weeks of exams, and a week of deliberation before we get results.

I guess that already counts as vacation, so summer vacation starts June 25th (technically July 2nd).
Another series of exams the weeks of the 20th and the 27th of August, apparently. I guess that’ll be needed for French, at least.

Next year starts September 17th.

Pretty meh, I guess.

Permalink Comments

Buttsecksu~

Skatje changed her blog software to WordPress, like the rest of us, which is dreadfully exciting.
Her dad posted on his own blog asking for name suggestions, which resulted in her first post being flooded with comments, but I’m sure she’ll recover.

Maia went back home for Thanksgiving and birfdey, apparently, though she doesn’t seem too excited about it.

As far as our Raven Project goes, a few people already sent in some verses. We now have:

    1. Me
    2. Skatje
    3. Diseased Maia
    4. Terras
    5. Healthful Maia
    6. Coren
    7. rednwhite (promised)

Keep ‘em coming. Just mail them to cairnarvon@rotahall.org, or transfer over G-Talk or MSN or whatever.

Permalink Comments

Raven Project

This probably won’t go anywhere, but I still want to try.

If you have a microphone, I would like you to record yourself reciting a verse of Edgar Allen Poe’s The Raven. Text can be found here.
Actually, since I went through the trouble of doing that Javascript thing, I might as well actually use it occasionally.

(Click to read The Raven. Again, doesn’t work in Thunderbird. Reclick to hide.)

I already have myself reciting the first one, Skatje reciting the second, and diseased Maia reciting the third (here). If you want to do this, please comment to say which verse you’re doing, so we don’t have doubles. Eventually I’d like to post the entire poem with the audio clips (though eighteen verses might be a bit too hopeful).

The reason I’d like to do this is because though I know what most of you people look like (I’m assuming; it’s entirely possibly I have tons of readers I don’t know), I don’t know what most of you sound like, seeing as how most of you don’t Skype and neither do I.

So yeah. Here’s another bunny. I promise kitties when this is done.

Permalink 10 Comments

Fuck yeah

D-List Blogger

Possibly I need to figure out Technorati. I’m pretty sure I’m C-list.

Permalink 1 Comment

Happy Benoît

Today is Benoît Mandelbrot’s 82nd birthday, apparently. To celebrate: mathematics.

This, along with counting on your fingers in binary, is probably to sort of thing they should’ve taught us in elementary school.

(Yes, I know his birthday is on the 20th and timestamp says 21st by now. Work with me.)

Permalink 1 Comment

Testing something~

Yeah, seems to be working. Audio player plug-in for WordPress. Pretty spiffy. Pretty spiffy indeed.
And yes, that’s me reciting the first verse of Poe’s The Raven. And yes, I know I sound out of breath and have a silly accent. Shut up. ;__;

(Also, it doesn’t show up in Thunderbird. Apparently nothing I can do about that.)

Permalink Comments