<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The blogger CoC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cairnarvon.rotahall.org/2007/04/10/the-blogger-coc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cairnarvon.rotahall.org/2007/04/10/the-blogger-coc/</link>
	<description>Unscientific and ultimately destructive.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 04:06:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: saythings</title>
		<link>http://cairnarvon.rotahall.org/2007/04/10/the-blogger-coc/comment-page-1/#comment-4472</link>
		<dc:creator>saythings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 15:43:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cairnarvon.rotahall.org/?p=715#comment-4472</guid>
		<description>Or &quot;disemvowelling&quot;?

I agree with Cairn though; The people who are already &quot;self-policing&quot; aren&#039;t the ones that are the problem.
Not to be too black and white about it, but people generally either have social responsibility or they don&#039;t. Some CoC isn&#039;t going to change that.

Reminds me of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comics_Code_Authority&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;CCA&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or &#8220;disemvowelling&#8221;?</p>
<p>I agree with Cairn though; The people who are already &#8220;self-policing&#8221; aren&#8217;t the ones that are the problem.<br />
Not to be too black and white about it, but people generally either have social responsibility or they don&#8217;t. Some CoC isn&#8217;t going to change that.</p>
<p>Reminds me of the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comics_Code_Authority" rel="nofollow">CCA</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: echomikeromeo</title>
		<link>http://cairnarvon.rotahall.org/2007/04/10/the-blogger-coc/comment-page-1/#comment-4444</link>
		<dc:creator>echomikeromeo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 06:09:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cairnarvon.rotahall.org/?p=715#comment-4444</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t it amazing how the phrase &quot;nublet fanboys&quot; didn&#039;t exist 10 years ago?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t it amazing how the phrase &#8220;nublet fanboys&#8221; didn&#8217;t exist 10 years ago?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cairnarvon</title>
		<link>http://cairnarvon.rotahall.org/2007/04/10/the-blogger-coc/comment-page-1/#comment-4432</link>
		<dc:creator>Cairnarvon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 03:28:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cairnarvon.rotahall.org/?p=715#comment-4432</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t ever visit 4chan, it will destroy your world~
Low-quality photoshops are about as hard to make as random threats. She freaked out over a random harmless troll. I get worse hate mail than that, and barely anyone reads my blog.
Maybe she just doesn&#039;t understand the internet, but still. She seems to expect the benefits of celebrity without any of the downsides. If you intend to be a public person, especially on the internet, you have to develop a reasonably thick skin, and an ability to recognise a 14-year-old with too much free time for what it is.

If it were just O&#039;Reilly, I&#039;m pretty sure this code of conduct would stop at him (and maybe a handful of other people; there are a bunch who have already adopted it), but Jimbo Wales is so desperate to be a social engineer, and he has so many nublet fanboys, that I really don&#039;t see this just dying quietly.
The me-too mentality is already pretty strong in the blogosphere, and it seems to increase exponentially as you increase Wikipedia and its related &quot;projects&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t ever visit 4chan, it will destroy your world~<br />
Low-quality photoshops are about as hard to make as random threats. She freaked out over a random harmless troll. I get worse hate mail than that, and barely anyone reads my blog.<br />
Maybe she just doesn&#8217;t understand the internet, but still. She seems to expect the benefits of celebrity without any of the downsides. If you intend to be a public person, especially on the internet, you have to develop a reasonably thick skin, and an ability to recognise a 14-year-old with too much free time for what it is.</p>
<p>If it were just O&#8217;Reilly, I&#8217;m pretty sure this code of conduct would stop at him (and maybe a handful of other people; there are a bunch who have already adopted it), but Jimbo Wales is so desperate to be a social engineer, and he has so many nublet fanboys, that I really don&#8217;t see this just dying quietly.<br />
The me-too mentality is already pretty strong in the blogosphere, and it seems to increase exponentially as you increase Wikipedia and its related &#8220;projects&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: taz</title>
		<link>http://cairnarvon.rotahall.org/2007/04/10/the-blogger-coc/comment-page-1/#comment-4431</link>
		<dc:creator>taz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 03:18:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cairnarvon.rotahall.org/?p=715#comment-4431</guid>
		<description>Why do you feel she was overreacting? Anonymous comments are easy to ignore, but I think it is genuinely disturbing when someone goes to the extra length of making gross photo manips. I can see why refusing to leave her house might be melodramatic, but shutting down her blog and refusing to go to a blogging/tech conference seem fairly reasonable to me.

I also can&#039;t readily agree with you that a Blogging Code of Conduct is harmful. I don&#039;t see it becoming a marker of credibility, but just another way for bloggers to denote their desire to control and be responsible what goes on at their blog -- or to denote that they don&#039;t care, if they use that &#039;free for all&#039; badge. 

Interesting things to think about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do you feel she was overreacting? Anonymous comments are easy to ignore, but I think it is genuinely disturbing when someone goes to the extra length of making gross photo manips. I can see why refusing to leave her house might be melodramatic, but shutting down her blog and refusing to go to a blogging/tech conference seem fairly reasonable to me.</p>
<p>I also can&#8217;t readily agree with you that a Blogging Code of Conduct is harmful. I don&#8217;t see it becoming a marker of credibility, but just another way for bloggers to denote their desire to control and be responsible what goes on at their blog &#8212; or to denote that they don&#8217;t care, if they use that &#8216;free for all&#8217; badge. </p>
<p>Interesting things to think about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: echomikeromeo</title>
		<link>http://cairnarvon.rotahall.org/2007/04/10/the-blogger-coc/comment-page-1/#comment-4424</link>
		<dc:creator>echomikeromeo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 01:30:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cairnarvon.rotahall.org/?p=715#comment-4424</guid>
		<description>Some of it - such as the &quot;no anonymous comments&quot; - seems to be against the general spirit of the internet. One of the reasons it&#039;s so wonderful is that it &lt;i&gt;does&lt;/i&gt; allow one to express oneself without an identity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some of it &#8211; such as the &#8220;no anonymous comments&#8221; &#8211; seems to be against the general spirit of the internet. One of the reasons it&#8217;s so wonderful is that it <i>does</i> allow one to express oneself without an identity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.178 seconds -->
