http://cairnarvon.rotahall.org/2007/04/15/on-special-relativity/ Unscientific and ultimately destructive. Wed, 07 Jan 2009 21:33:53 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1 http://cairnarvon.rotahall.org/2007/04/15/on-special-relativity/#comment-4524 Cairnarvon Sun, 15 Apr 2007 22:04:05 +0000 http://cairnarvon.rotahall.org/?p=727#comment-4524 Not for a while. It's not particularly fun to explain. >.> Not for a while. It’s not particularly fun to explain. >.>

]]> http://cairnarvon.rotahall.org/2007/04/15/on-special-relativity/#comment-4523 Coren Sun, 15 Apr 2007 22:01:28 +0000 http://cairnarvon.rotahall.org/?p=727#comment-4523 Kay. Next post: general relativity for nubies. Kay.
Next post: general relativity for nubies.

]]> http://cairnarvon.rotahall.org/2007/04/15/on-special-relativity/#comment-4520 Cairnarvon Sun, 15 Apr 2007 21:00:29 +0000 http://cairnarvon.rotahall.org/?p=727#comment-4520 Because the moving twin undergoes acceleration. That's the area of general relativity, not special. Because the moving twin undergoes acceleration. That’s the area of general relativity, not special.

]]> http://cairnarvon.rotahall.org/2007/04/15/on-special-relativity/#comment-4519 Coren Sun, 15 Apr 2007 20:58:31 +0000 http://cairnarvon.rotahall.org/?p=727#comment-4519 Wait wait wait... It's been a while since I read about this kind of thing, so don't kill me if I'm being an idiot, but what about the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twin_paradox" rel="nofollow">twin paradox</a>? Why don't the effects cancel themselves out in this case? Wait wait wait… It’s been a while since I read about this kind of thing, so don’t kill me if I’m being an idiot, but what about the twin paradox? Why don’t the effects cancel themselves out in this case?

]]>