<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Year seriously over now</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cairnarvon.rotahall.org/2008/06/28/year-seriously-over-now/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cairnarvon.rotahall.org/2008/06/28/year-seriously-over-now/</link>
	<description>Unscientific and ultimately destructive.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 09:52:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cairnarvon</title>
		<link>http://cairnarvon.rotahall.org/2008/06/28/year-seriously-over-now/comment-page-1/#comment-30591</link>
		<dc:creator>Cairnarvon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 08:17:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cairnarvon.rotahall.org/?p=997#comment-30591</guid>
		<description>Plain arrays would be too slow to either search in or to add/remove entries (depending on how you did it), unless you used a few of them to implement your own data structure. Java is probably too ``high-level&#039;&#039; to let you do that efficiently.
&lt;code&gt;ArrayList&lt;/code&gt; and &lt;code&gt;Vector&lt;/code&gt; are too slow in that they&#039;re basically just dynamically resizable arrays and manipulating them is going to require a lot of copying data around.

So yeah, unless you know something about data structures (which we officially don&#039;t), it&#039;s pretty hard to get it right with just arrays, and he&#039;s just trying to steer us in the direction of whatever specific library class he&#039;s thinking of.

(&lt;code&gt;Vector&lt;/code&gt; is just a synchronised &lt;code&gt;ArrayList&lt;/code&gt; with some redundant methods added.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Plain arrays would be too slow to either search in or to add/remove entries (depending on how you did it), unless you used a few of them to implement your own data structure. Java is probably too &#8220;high-level&#8221; to let you do that efficiently.<br />
<code>ArrayList</code> and <code>Vector</code> are too slow in that they&#8217;re basically just dynamically resizable arrays and manipulating them is going to require a lot of copying data around.</p>
<p>So yeah, unless you know something about data structures (which we officially don&#8217;t), it&#8217;s pretty hard to get it right with just arrays, and he&#8217;s just trying to steer us in the direction of whatever specific library class he&#8217;s thinking of.</p>
<p>(<code>Vector</code> is just a synchronised <code>ArrayList</code> with some redundant methods added.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: echomikeromeo</title>
		<link>http://cairnarvon.rotahall.org/2008/06/28/year-seriously-over-now/comment-page-1/#comment-30589</link>
		<dc:creator>echomikeromeo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 08:04:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cairnarvon.rotahall.org/?p=997#comment-30589</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m still hung up on why you wouldn&#039;t want to use ArrayList or arrays (I don&#039;t know Vector, since I&#039;ve only had a semester). Is it just cause you&#039;re supposed to be doing something more advanced, or is an array/ArrayList actually a dumb solution to the problem?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m still hung up on why you wouldn&#8217;t want to use ArrayList or arrays (I don&#8217;t know Vector, since I&#8217;ve only had a semester). Is it just cause you&#8217;re supposed to be doing something more advanced, or is an array/ArrayList actually a dumb solution to the problem?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.364 seconds -->
