<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 1 Kings 7:23</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cairnarvon.rotahall.org/2009/12/22/1-kings-723/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cairnarvon.rotahall.org/2009/12/22/1-kings-723/</link>
	<description>Unscientific and ultimately destructive.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 09:52:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cairnarvon.rotahall.org/2009/12/22/1-kings-723/comment-page-1/#comment-45722</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 17:45:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cairnarvon.rotahall.org/?p=1637#comment-45722</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know if anybody got the trick. My math teachers always tried to beat it into me that the square root of x squared is the absolute value of x, not just x. This is the greatest example of why. For anyone who doesn&#039;t get it: replace the 3 in the first statement with four, and magically pi = 4 now instead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know if anybody got the trick. My math teachers always tried to beat it into me that the square root of x squared is the absolute value of x, not just x. This is the greatest example of why. For anyone who doesn&#8217;t get it: replace the 3 in the first statement with four, and magically pi = 4 now instead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cairnarvon</title>
		<link>http://cairnarvon.rotahall.org/2009/12/22/1-kings-723/comment-page-1/#comment-44924</link>
		<dc:creator>Cairnarvon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 21:56:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cairnarvon.rotahall.org/?p=1637#comment-44924</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not dividing by 0 anywhere.
The Bible and Twilight must be the only books in the world for which just pointing out what&#039;s in it counts as &quot;bashing&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not dividing by 0 anywhere.<br />
The Bible and Twilight must be the only books in the world for which just pointing out what&#8217;s in it counts as &#8220;bashing&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cairnarvon.rotahall.org/2009/12/22/1-kings-723/comment-page-1/#comment-44922</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 21:48:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cairnarvon.rotahall.org/?p=1637#comment-44922</guid>
		<description>it&#039;s funny because you&#039;re bashing the bible and dividing by 0 in one post</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it&#8217;s funny because you&#8217;re bashing the bible and dividing by 0 in one post</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cairnarvon</title>
		<link>http://cairnarvon.rotahall.org/2009/12/22/1-kings-723/comment-page-1/#comment-44313</link>
		<dc:creator>Cairnarvon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 19:56:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cairnarvon.rotahall.org/?p=1637#comment-44313</guid>
		<description>If we&#039;re picking inaccurate translations to suit, the most popular Dutch translation (&quot;Het Boek&quot;) actually convert it to meters, with two digits after the &lt;s&gt;comma&lt;/s&gt; period (so the circumference is off by half a meter). The NLT converts to feet, because the metric system is for commies, works with half feet, and is off by two feet.
Not much of an unchanging word of God, if people are just going to try to pretend the embarrassing bits don&#039;t exist. I wonder if there&#039;s a translation that fixes the claim that bats are birds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If we&#8217;re picking inaccurate translations to suit, the most popular Dutch translation (&#8220;Het Boek&#8221;) actually convert it to meters, with two digits after the <s>comma</s> period (so the circumference is off by half a meter). The NLT converts to feet, because the metric system is for commies, works with half feet, and is off by two feet.<br />
Not much of an unchanging word of God, if people are just going to try to pretend the embarrassing bits don&#8217;t exist. I wonder if there&#8217;s a translation that fixes the claim that bats are birds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hotaru</title>
		<link>http://cairnarvon.rotahall.org/2009/12/22/1-kings-723/comment-page-1/#comment-44312</link>
		<dc:creator>hotaru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 19:44:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cairnarvon.rotahall.org/?p=1637#comment-44312</guid>
		<description>a couple things worth mentioning in addition to the obviously wrong math:
1. &quot;And he made the sea, ten in cubits from its rim to its rim; the same was round in a circle; it&#039;s height was five in cubits and drawn together, *thirty-three* in cubits encompassed it.&quot; (NETS, emphasis added)
2. note that these measurements are probably rounded to the nearest cubit, and the sea in question may not have been perfectly circular.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>a couple things worth mentioning in addition to the obviously wrong math:<br />
1. &#8220;And he made the sea, ten in cubits from its rim to its rim; the same was round in a circle; it&#8217;s height was five in cubits and drawn together, *thirty-three* in cubits encompassed it.&#8221; (NETS, emphasis added)<br />
2. note that these measurements are probably rounded to the nearest cubit, and the sea in question may not have been perfectly circular.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Factor my Posterior</title>
		<link>http://cairnarvon.rotahall.org/2009/12/22/1-kings-723/comment-page-1/#comment-44235</link>
		<dc:creator>Factor my Posterior</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 21:20:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cairnarvon.rotahall.org/?p=1637#comment-44235</guid>
		<description>&gt; (3-(pi+3)/2)^2 --&gt; 3-(pi+3)/2  &#124;&#124;  (-0.0707963268)^2 --&gt; 0.0707963268
dohoho~</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; (3-(pi+3)/2)^2 &#8211;&gt; 3-(pi+3)/2  ||  (-0.0707963268)^2 &#8211;&gt; 0.0707963268<br />
dohoho~</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 1.241 seconds -->
